HTC Touch Diamond with US 3G Review

November 16, 2008

Okay, here are my main impressions of the Touch Diamond so far:

  • Ridiculously small and thin to be as powerful as it is! Though it is thicker than the original EU version of the Diamond, I’m very happy with how thin it remains even with the larger battery and thicker back (which I think is still slightly thinner than the Sprint Diamond).
  • The matte back feels every bit as good as I’d hoped and makes me hope a similar backing becomes available for the Fuze (dear HTC please, although I’m not sure why the back of the original Touch wouldn’t work?)
  • Overall build quality is more plasticky than it should be.
  • Stylus is much smaller than I expected, and not meaty at all (very disappointingly), though the cool magnetic stylus silo works as advertised, thankfully.
  • TouchFlo 3D would be incredible on a capacitive touch screen, but on a resistive screen it is somewhat frustrating (though HTC deserves tons of credit for making it work at all on top of Windows Mobile).
  • Speaking of the screen, it feels like it’s further away from the resistive layer behind the screen than other WM touch screens I’ve used. And though I’m sure this was necessary to make the screen flush to the device, which looks great, in practice it means neither the touch, nor the stylus experience against the screen is efficient or satisfying.
  • Speaking more on the screen, the 640×480 VGA resolution sure is pretty, but on 2.8 inches of screen space it doesn’t seem to really add any more visibility in applications (with one exception to be discussed in a moment). Regardless, I think screen real estate matters much more than I realized (provided of course the resolution isn’t too low). Bottom line is the iPhone with it’s 320×480 3.5 inch screen looks nearly as crisp and definitely displays more info than the Diamond.
  • The Dpad, Home and Back buttons are certainly attractive looking in their flush positioning, but they are therefore as finicky to control as I expected. The strobing indicator light around the Dpad when a new message is waiting to be viewed is a very nice feature though.
  • The volume controls allow much quicker control over system and ringer sound than on any WM device I’ve ever used. Thank you for that HTC, and what the heck took so long?! (the stock non Touchflo 3D volume control in WM is in a word, abysmal)
  • The 3.2 mp camera with auto focus is very decent. In fact, I would argue it’s a good bonafide camera in good lighting.
  • Call quality is quite honestly outstanding on this device.
  • The build of the Opera browser I’ve been using (on a cooked ROM, so it’s further up the beta list than the one in the stock ROM) has been quite honestly awful though. The one on the stock ROM wasn’t much better (though it didn’t play flash in the browser as the latest build does). The rendering of pages is slow enough to make the presence of a 3G radio seem pointless at times.
  • Also, the other Opera mobile browser, Opera Mini was not meant to be viewed on a 2.8 inch VGA screen apparently, as at the largest font setting it is still illegibly small. This is the potential deal breaker for me and I’m hoping Opera Mini on the Panther will be as good as it was on the Tilt….iPhone you still have hope!
Advertisements

One Response to “HTC Touch Diamond with US 3G Review”

  1. Ol' Melanie Says:

    Stacy sent all of her readers to your blog, but I need a whole new dictionary to read this! My brain started hurting when I saw all of the bulleted points and so few pictures. Of which none featured Hollis.You are too smart for me.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: